Where Proof Gaps Usually Show up and Why Close Slows Down)

Most teams don’t struggle because they lack receipts.
They struggle because retrieval, reconciliation, standardization, & exceptions control break under audit pressure.

Evidence Retrieval Speed

If finance is asked for support on a transaction, how quickly can the full proof trail be produced?

WHAT WE TEST:

  • Transaction, receipt, settlement + approval retrieval time
  • Searchability (no email/WhatsApp chasing)
  • Tamper risk (can changes be traced?)
Outlet & Shift Standardization
Does proof stay consistent across outlets and shifts, or does finance inherit variation later?

WHAT WE TEST:

  • Receipt format consistency 
  • Standard handling for missing/duplicate/mismatches
  • Outlet → finance proof handoff consistency
Payment Rail Reconciliation

Do card, QR, and e-wallet settlements tie cleanly to POS records, receipts and the finance ledger?

WHAT WE TEST:

  • POS → payment rail → ledger traceability
  • Frequency of mismatches and manual stitching
  • In-system reconciliation (not spreadsheets)
Exceptions & Reversals Control

Are refunds, voids, and discounts supported by complete, traceable proof?

WHAT WE TEST:

  • Approvals + supporting docs for exceptions
  • Retention of exception proof (all outlets/shifts)
  • Reversal traceability (end-to-end)

How it works

 In 5 minutes, see where your proof gaps are most likely to sit and what finance should address first. 

In 5 minutes, we score four control areas:

  • Evidence retrieval speed: Can finance produce complete support quickly when a transaction is questioned?
  • Outlet & shift standardization: Is proof handled consistently across outlets and teams?
  • Payment rail reconciliation: Do card, QR, and e-wallet transactions tie cleanly back to receipts and the ledger?
  • Exceptions & reversals control: Are refunds, voids, and discounts backed by traceable, defensible proof?

Your results are shown immediately at the end.